In this session, Hughes will focus on Multimodal GraphRAG (mmGraphRAG), a transformative step forward in bridging multimodal data through innovative search and analytics frameworks, and demonstrate how integrating the semantic richness of images and text with the contextual reasoning power of graphs provides a comprehensive, explainable, and actionable approach to solving complex data challenges.

Register here to join the conference!

The post David Hughes Speaking at AI in Production by MLOps Community appeared first on Enterprise Knowledge.

Unlike standalone LLMs, which often struggle with outdated or irrelevant information, RAG architectures ensure domain-specific knowledge transfer by providing some organizational context in which an AI model operates within the enterprise. This makes RAG a critical tool for aligning AI outputs with an organization’s unique expertise, reducing errors, and enhancing decision-making. As organizations increasingly rely on RAG for tailored AI solutions, a strong data governance framework becomes essential to ensure the quality, integrity, and relevance of the knowledge fueling these systems.

At the heart of RAG’s success lies the data driving the process. The quality, structure, and accessibility of this data directly influence the effectiveness of the RAG architecture. For RAG to deliver context-aware insights, it must rely on information that is accurate, current, well-organized, and readily retrievable. Without a robust framework to manage this data, RAG solutions risk being hampered by inconsistencies, inaccuracies, or gaps in the information pipeline. This is where RAG-specific data governance becomes indispensable. Unlike general data governance, which focuses on managing enterprise-wide data assets, RAG data governance specifically addresses the curation, structuring, and accessibility of knowledge used in retrieval and generation processes. It ensures that the data fed into RAG models remains relevant, up-to-date, and aligned with business objectives, enabling AI-driven insights that are both accurate and actionable.

A strong data governance framework is foundational to ensuring the quality, integrity, and relevance of the knowledge that fuels RAG systems. Such a framework encompasses the processes, policies, and standards necessary to manage data assets effectively throughout their lifecycle. From data ingestion and storage to processing and retrieval, governance practices ensure that the data driving RAG solutions remain trustworthy and fit for purpose.

To establish this connection, this article delves into key governance strategies tailored for two major types of RAG: general/vector-based RAG and graph-based RAG. These strategies are designed to address each approach’s unique data requirements while highlighting shared practices essential to both. The tables below illustrate the governance practices specific to each RAG type, as well as the overlapping principles that form the foundation of effective data governance across both methods.

What is Vector-Based RAG?

RAG Vector-Based AI leverages vector embeddings (embeddings are mathematical representations of text that help systems understand the semantic meaning of words, sentences, and documents) to retrieve semantically similar data from dense vector databases, such as Pinecone or Weaviate.  The approach is based on vector search, a technique that converts text into numerical representations (vectors) and then finds documents that are most similar to a user’s query. This approach is ideal for unstructured text and multimedia data, making it particularly reliant on robust data governance.

What is Graph RAG?

Graph RAG combines generative models with graph databases such as Neo4j, AWS Neptune, Graphwise, GraphDB, or Stardog, which represent relationships between data points. This approach is particularly suited for knowledge graphs and ontology-driven AI.

Key Data Governance Practices for RAG

Practices Applicable to Both Vector-Based and Graph-Based RAG

Practices Unique to Vector-Based RAG

Practices Unique to Graph-Based RAG

Refer to Top 5 Tips for Managing and Versioning an Ontology for suggestions on ontology governance. 

Refer to Taxonomy Design Best Practices for more on taxonomy governance.

Case Study: Impact of Lack of RAG Governance

• Inaccurate and Irrelevant Insights: Without proper RAG governance, AI systems may pull outdated or inconsistent information, leading to inaccurate insights and flawed decision-making that can cost organizations time and resources. 
  • “Garbage In, Garbage Out: How Poor Data Governance Poisons AI”
    This article discusses how inadequate data governance can lead to unreliable AI outcomes, emphasizing the importance of proper data management.
    labs.sogeti.com
  • “AI’s Achilles’ Heel: The Consequence of Bad Data”
    This article highlights the critical role of data quality in AI performance and the risks associated with poor data governance.
    versium.com
  • “Understanding the Impact of Lack of Data Governance”
    This resource outlines the risks and consequences of poor data governance, providing insights into how it can affect business operations.
    actian.com
• Difficulty in Scaling AI Systems: A lack of structured governance limits the scalability of RAG solutions. As the volume of data grows, it becomes harder to ensure that the right information is retrieved and used, resulting in inefficient AI models.
• Data Silos and Inaccessibility: Without proper metadata management and access control, important knowledge may remain isolated or inaccessible, reducing the effectiveness of AI in providing actionable insights across departments.
• Compliance and Security Risks: The absence of governance may lead to failures in data sovereignty and privacy requirements, exposing the organization to compliance risks, potential breaches, and reputational damage.
• Loss of Stakeholder Confidence: As RAG outputs become unreliable and inconsistent, stakeholders may lose confidence in AI-driven decisions, affecting future investment and buy-in from key decision-makers.

Conclusion

Effective data governance is crucial for RAG, regardless of the retrieval method. RAG Vector-Based AI relies on embedding standards, efficient indexing, quality controls, and strong metadata management, while Graph RAG demands careful management of ontologies, taxonomy, and tracking data lineage. By applying tailored governance strategies for each type, organizations can maximize the value of their AI systems, ensuring accurate, secure, and compliant data retrieval.

Graph RAG AI is the future of contextual intelligence, offering unparalleled potential to unlock insights from interconnected data. By combining advanced graph technologies with industry-best data governance practices, EK helps organizations transform their data into actionable knowledge while maintaining security and scalability.

As organizations look to unlock the full potential of their data-driven solutions, robust data governance becomes key. EK delivers Graph RAG AI solutions that reflect domain-specific needs, with governance frameworks that ensure data integrity, security, and compliance. Please check out our case studies for more details on how we have helped organizations in similar domains. EK also optimizes graph performance for scalable AI-driven insights. If your organization is ready to elevate its RAG initiatives with effective data governance, contact us today to explore how we can help you transform your data into actionable knowledge while maintaining security and scalability.

Is your organization ready to elevate its RAG initiatives with robust data governance? Contact us to unlock the full potential of your data-driven solutions.

The post Data Governance for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) appeared first on Enterprise Knowledge.

In this presentation, Hughes discussed an underexplored dimension of GraphRAG–the integration of image–by introducing Multimodal GraphRAG, an innovative framework that brings image data to the forefront of graph-based reasoning and retrieval. He demonstrated how this approach enables more comprehensive understanding of images, amplifying both the depth and accuracy of insights. Attendees gained insight into:

• How mmGraphRAG works;
• The integration of vision models, hypervectors, and graph databases;
• BAML agentic workflows; and
• Real-world applications and benefits for mmGraphRAG.

The post Multimodal Graph RAG (mmGraphRAG): Incorporating Vision in Search and Analytics appeared first on Enterprise Knowledge.

In this presentation, Hughes will introduce Multimodal GraphRAG, an innovative framework that brings image data to the forefront of graph-based reasoning and retrieval. By extracting meaningful objects and features from images, and linking them with text-based semantics, Multimodal GraphRAG unlocks new pathways for surfacing insights. From images embedded in documents to collections of related visuals, he will demonstrate how this approach enables more comprehensive understanding, amplifying both the depth and accuracy of insights.

Hughes will also be sticking around through Sunday, January 26th for select participants, co-leading an interactive Data Discussion on hyperdimensional computing (HDC) and neuromorphic cognitive computing with Amy Hodler, AI and Graph Analytics Program Manager at Neo4j, on “Hyperdimensional Horizons: Exploring Neuromorphic Intelligence and Graph Applications.”

For more information on the conference, check out the website here.

The post David Hughes Speaking at Data Day Texas 2025 appeared first on Enterprise Knowledge.